DO FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES???

The truth of the matter is that facts don't speak at all. People with bias oppinions arrange the facts to give credence to their beliefs. I am not writing this to blow holes in everything you believe, we are able to think for ourselves and make our own decisions as to what we chose believe. I challenge you to take the time and read the information available and check out the so called facts for yourselves. Living in an age where information is at your fingertips, all you need to do is turn on your computer.

Evolutionists say that things make themselves and that no divine intervention has happened. The framework behind evolution is the interpretation reached by placing only the facts that agree with their assumptions in such a way as to sound plausable. The problem with this is that if you research this subject, you'll find that the theory has no beginning, that there is no orderly progression leading to or providing scientific evidence in this theory. You will find that evolutionists say they are still looking for the answers and what they provide is a hodge podge of unconnected assumptions that try to prove an idea that can never be proven.

Mathematicians, biologists, atheists, and scientists of this day have written, "Evolution is a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven by logical evidence to be true, but because the only alternative, creation, is clearly incredible.

The answer to this question is not based on biased religious creationists verses scientific evolutionists, but belief in God as the Creator, verses secular humanism.

NOTHING TO SOMETHING BANG!

CREATION/SCIENCE or EVOLUTION/PHILOSOPHY

While evolutionists try to confuse the facts with philosophical rhetoric, it is important to realize that their opinions are geared to mislead you. While continually pharsing by comparison of words like creation with religion, and evolution with science. Planting seeds of misinformation through the bias oppinions of evolutionary leaders. Why is it evolutionists expend time and space to dispute creation science, rather than prove evolution is more than a theory or philosophy.

First we must look at the way that evolutionists bias and assumptions affect the interpretations of scientific evidence. Evolution began with Darwin's theory, which is a deduction from his assumption of the idea that things made themselves, and that God is not the Creator of all life. The idea of evolution is that from nothing came something, producing the alleged "Big Bang," non-living matter which gave birth to life.

This is the problem, as I see it. The "Big Bang" must have been very big, it produced our universe and an infinate number of other universes that encompass limitless space, with planets, stars, and all life as we know or as diverse as the imagination can concoct. Mankind is considered an intellegent lifeform, and as such, can you honestly tell me you believe this?

I look forward to any comments or insight on this subject.

MOLECULES TO MAN or GOO TO YOU

REFUTING EVOLUTION

The gaps are huge and the holes as numerous as stars in the night sky. In reading over the facts taught about evolution, I found they avoid discussing the vast gulf between living and non-living matter, single cell and the multicelled creatures, invertebrates and vertebrates. The reason evolutionists avoid these topics is the gaps between these groups are enough to show that molecules-to-man evolution is without foundation.

The theory of evolution is a prime example of junk science. Evolution began with Darwin's theory 150 years ago, since then, they have used bits and pieces and arranged the science to conform to their preconceived conclusion. Rather than following the scientific evidence to uncover the truth. When finding fully developed fossils, evolution's answer is we haven't found the missing links yet. Now, 150 years later and still no missing link, evolution's answer, they take partial fragements and put these fossils together, calling it the missing link. Evolutionists haven't found anything in the fossil record, not even a small section of any creature, that would prove transitional or intermediary forms of life.

Turtles leave more and better fossil remains than do other vertebrates, yet, the oldest known sea turtle was a fully formed turtle, not at all transitional. At its appearence, it had a fully developed system for excreting salt, without which a marine reptile would quickly dehydrate. This is shown by skull cavities which have large salt-excrting glands around the eyes.

All 32 mammal orders appear abruptly and fully formed in the fossil record. From the earliest and most primitive of these members, in no case is there evidence of intermediates showing a series of changes. The fossil evidence, Darwin believed would prove his theory, has in fact shown sudden appearence, proving Creation.

Evolutionists have recovered thousands of tons of fossils, from all over the world, if there was any type of transition taking place they would have found evidence proving their theory. Yet the facts speak for themselves, in revealing fully formed creatures, this indicates sudden appearance, pointing to Creation as the answer to our origin, anything else is a fabrication.

References
Refuting Evolution, Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D, F.M.
Missing Links, George Gayford Simpson, Paleontologist
Bones of Contention, (Neandertals, Homo erectus) Marvin Luberow
The Links Are Missing, Creation Magazine (creation.com)

THERMODYNAMICS

READJUSTING TO THE ENVIRONMENT

The Second Law of Thermodynamics refers to the universal tendency for things, on their own to "mix" with their surrounding environment over time, becoming less ordered and eventually reaching a steady-state. Overtime buildings decay into rubble and are reclaimed by the plants and animals that once surrounded it. A simple analogy would be a cup of hot coffee left out becomes room temperature. Stars eventually burn out and die.

The evolutionary scenario proposes that over time things, on their own, become more ordered and structured. Evolutionists want you to believe that somehow, the energy of the "Big Bang" structured itself into stars, galaxies, planets, and all living things, contrary to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

We were created to adapt to our surroundings, thus insuring the continuation of life. This is not evolution, it is however, a survival mechanism, that was pre-programmed into our genes at the moment of our creation. Our Creator is a Being of unimaginable intellect and complete understanding of all that would be needed, within ourselves and outside of His main creation to insure survival. At the moment of creation, Laws were put in place, that will continue until the end of time. These Laws act and react to maintain the environment and allow life to adapt to changes in its surroundings in a brief period of time.

Evolution takes millions, or billions of years to effect change, using this standard, life could not survive to evolve into the necessary changes needed to continue. Our world as a whole is decaying, not evolving, and will reach a point where it will not be able to sustain life.

The evidence is all around us, and we are the ones who caused this destruction. In our greed we have poisoned the earth, destroyed the ozone, and now it is coming back at us. The lead and mercury is in the water we drink, destroying our brain, the poison we used to kill insects is in the food we eat, causing all types of cancer, the bombs we tested, above and below the earth, and in the oceans, has poisoned the fish we eat and the air we breath. That is only the tip of the iceberg. What about all the chemicals we've dumped into the ground, the rivers, and the oceans,
all of this is coming back at us, with every breath we take, the water we drink, and the food we eat.

God gave us a beautiful world, created for us with everything we needed to insure our survival and increase to populate the whole earth. God gave us ten simple commandments to keep our world safe and in-turn insure our health and numbers. Yet, we chose to follow the path of greed which leads to our own destruction.

EVIDENCES OF CREATION

INFORMATION
This is what evolution cannot answer. Where did the information come from that is embedded in every cell of every living organism. This information gives each and every living object form and insures its continuation. Every living organism you see is designed to look a certain way, as well as its behavior, this is programed into each cell. This is true in all life, be it plant, animal, or human.

The information within each cell directs the way we are made and how we look. There are variations in this design that give each of us an individual appearance. While we are basically made the same, our DNA directs the color of skin, eyes, and hair. This also directs our size, bone structure, and intelligence.

Evolution does not have an answer for information. This cannot evolve because information is already present within each cell to give form and design. The cell is a miniature factory, with many active processes, a blob without information will remain a blob. The seed of a plant will produce a plant, the information is there within the seed and it is ready to reproduce itself. Billions of bits of information are there and ready to do their job. The seed of a plant will never produce a human, nor a seed of a human produce anything but what it was designed to reproduce.

Everything comes down to information and who put that information there? The only answer is intelligent design, the results is always intelligent design. The instructions for building, operating, and repairing living cells is present and represents a vast amount of information. This information is present and complete in every living organism, natural process does not allow for a completed living organism, if it is evolving it is missing information which is vital to all life. Information points to sudden appearance, not evolution.

INFORMATION, FORMATION, & DESIGN = CREATION

IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS INTELLIGENT DESIGN

The basic flaw of all evolutionary views is the origin of the information in living beings. The theoretical proposition, statement, or formula embodying something to be proved from other propositions or formulas. A rule or law, one expressed by an equation or formula. A theory is an idea that is generally accepted but, unproven.
That is where evolution is, unproven. It has never been shown that a coding system and semantic information could originate by itself in a material medium, and the information theorems predict that this will never be possible.

CREATION OR PRIMORDIAL SOUP

The evolutionists portray the beginning of life as spontaneously arising from some kind of "primordial soup." A primitive ocean of warm nutrients, just there (somewhere) when it is struck by lightning, the catalyst that imparts the spark of life. Soon after this life begins to form and at some point in time it walks out of the soup and onto a barren lifeless planet.

The theory of evolution is about stages of evolving from the first stage of life, to the second stage, and so on. To go from a spark on a barren lifeless dirtball to a planet filled with all types of life we would have to pass through numerous stages of evolution. It takes more than a transition from ocean to land and I want to take a look at what is needed to make this possible, the billions of bits of information to begin life. To show that a progression is not possible, because life needs to be sustained by a fully developed atmosphere with plant and animals, a world that is complete. A world where everything works together to promote and sustain life.

To begin with we need atmosphere and a favorable environment for life to evolve in, to sustain its form while evolving into other life forms. In a vacuum of space where there are no clouds to produce lightning. Staring with simple organic molecules, the most basic of these, with the means of constructing the building blocks of life. One little spec, a molecule with billions of bits of information to construct life.

Then to go on to the large macro-molecules, (proteins) DNA, RNA, etc. Starting from the basic, simple molecules that must be assembled to build and produce the useful large molecules needed for the more complex lifeforms. A planet with atmosphere, fresh water, plants to produce oxygen and food. All this before a complex form like man, is able to survive.

The next stage in this process is the biological systems. All lifeforms need many of these systems to continue to exist, such as consuming needed nutrients and converting it to energy used to maintain life. Life cannot survive in a world where all aspects to support this life are still under development. Each piece must be complete to work with the whole, or all life dies. If there are plants and bees are not introduced, they cannot procreate, they need the bee to pollinate to produce and reproduce.

Now all these molecules and systems must be assembled to interact together forming a highly complex living cell. Each stage of this complex unit, in and of it self is composed of billions of bits of information to enable it to function for the purpose of maintaining the whole life-form. Yet each life form depends on all the life around it, it all works together, fully developed. Each piece is complete to work together in the whole. Like an engine of a car, all the pieces are put together, then it will work, you can't use a gear that is incomplete. If one piece is not finished, then the whole cannot operate. Life is exactly like that, it's all or nothing.

When each of these stages are examined scientifically, we find each has tremendous problems and cannot exist using the theory of evolution when explaining the origin of all life. It would require a gigantic leap of faith to believe in a theory that has more holes than substance. What evolution cannot prove is a beginning and all the fossil evidence in the world will not change that fact. Yet you will find evolutionists covering up this tremendous flaw with book after book about fossils, or I should say parts of fosils put together in an effort to prove gradual change from ape to man. How can you ignore all other life forms when explaining the origins of life, it all works together like a finely tuned engine, each part fully formed for its purpose.

To explain the origin of life by non-supernatural means we must have a plausible explanation for each and every stage in development. However all you will get with evolution is lightning striking a ocean of primordial soup and a gap that jumps to self-replicating lifeforms. That explanation is inadequate, lacking scientific evidence and misleading to cover-up the gigantic flaws in this theory. All evolutionists talk about are fossils to try to prove their theory, but the fossils are not whole they are pieces put together to fit in their theory.

NOW TELL ME WHY THE GOVERNMENT ALLOWS THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN LIES! I'll tell you why.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS TURNING ITS BACK ON GOD!


WHY ARE THEY AFRAID TO TEACH BOTH CREATION AND EVOLUTION AND LET THE STUDENTS DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES!

I WILL ANSWER ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON CREATION VERSES EVOLUTION!