Christians are considered a threat to the theory of evolution for exposing the lie of molecules-to-man. When in fact, everything we know about science indicates there is no possible way that ordinary chemicals, or inanimate matter would self-assemble to form living cells. How is it possible for these same cells to combine until they formed a fish, then the fish grew legs and walked on land. This ridiculous myth continues as the fish gives birth to birds, reptiles, mammals, monkeys, and finally man. And they say evolutionists don't have faith.
Many top evolutionary scientists have no idea how inanimate matter could evolved into living organisms. The co-discoverer of DNA, Francis Crick admitted, "The origin of life seems almost to be a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going." Top evolutionary scientist Professor Stuart Kaufman wrote, "Anyone who tells you he or she knows how life started on earth is a fool or a knave. No one knows." Committed evolutionist and former director of the human genome project Francis Collins wrote, "No current hypothesis comes close to explaining how, the prebiotic environment that existed on planet earth gave rise to life." The more scientists learn about what went into the creation of life, the sheer magnitude of information detailed in our DNA prove evolution as a desperate attempt to disqualify Creation, or intelligent design.
Everything we know about science confirms that ordinary chemicals would not self-assemble to form living cells. Laws of chemistry dictate that the bio polymers required for life would break down rather than build themselves. If by some miracle they did self-assemble, it is absurd to imagine that undirected processes would cause them to have the correct form. Informed evolutionists know all this very well-- but still are committed to the religion of scientism, that everything around us can and should be explained only by natural process. They ignore the scientific facts because it is unthinkable to them that a Creator, God is responsible for biological life. Such thinking makes it quite clear that the evolution/creation debate is not about science; it is about one worldview verses another.
Many top evolutionary scientists have no idea how inanimate matter could evolved into living organisms. The co-discoverer of DNA, Francis Crick admitted, "The origin of life seems almost to be a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going." Top evolutionary scientist Professor Stuart Kaufman wrote, "Anyone who tells you he or she knows how life started on earth is a fool or a knave. No one knows." Committed evolutionist and former director of the human genome project Francis Collins wrote, "No current hypothesis comes close to explaining how, the prebiotic environment that existed on planet earth gave rise to life." The more scientists learn about what went into the creation of life, the sheer magnitude of information detailed in our DNA prove evolution as a desperate attempt to disqualify Creation, or intelligent design.
Everything we know about science confirms that ordinary chemicals would not self-assemble to form living cells. Laws of chemistry dictate that the bio polymers required for life would break down rather than build themselves. If by some miracle they did self-assemble, it is absurd to imagine that undirected processes would cause them to have the correct form. Informed evolutionists know all this very well-- but still are committed to the religion of scientism, that everything around us can and should be explained only by natural process. They ignore the scientific facts because it is unthinkable to them that a Creator, God is responsible for biological life. Such thinking makes it quite clear that the evolution/creation debate is not about science; it is about one worldview verses another.
