CREATION/SCIENCE or EVOLUTION/PHILOSOPHY
While evolutionists try to confuse the facts with philosophical rhetoric, it is important to realize that their opinions are geared to mislead you. While continually pharsing by comparison of words like creation with religion, and evolution with science. Planting seeds of misinformation through the bias oppinions of evolutionary leaders. Why is it evolutionists expend time and space to dispute creation science, rather than prove evolution is more than a theory or philosophy.
First we must look at the way that evolutionists bias and assumptions affect the interpretations of scientific evidence. Evolution began with Darwin's theory, which is a deduction from his assumption of the idea that things made themselves, and that God is not the Creator of all life. The idea of evolution is that from nothing came something, producing the alleged "Big Bang," non-living matter which gave birth to life.
This is the problem, as I see it. The "Big Bang" must have been very big, it produced our universe and an infinate number of other universes that encompass limitless space, with planets, stars, and all life as we know or as diverse as the imagination can concoct. Mankind is considered an intellegent lifeform, and as such, can you honestly tell me you believe this?
I look forward to any comments or insight on this subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment